The accompanying report of the US Broadband Coalition culminates eighteen months of intensive effort to develop a comprehensive national broadband strategy that would be worthy of our great nation.
Author: admin
USDA: “Broadband Internet’s Value to Rural America”
As broadband—or high-speed—Internet use has spread, Internet applications requiring high transmission speeds have become an integral part of the “Information Economy,” raising concerns about those who lack broadband access. This report analyzes (1) rural broadband use by consumers, the community-at-large, and businesses; (2) rural broadband availability; and (3) broadband’s social and economic effects on rural areas. It also summarizes results from an ERS-sponsored workshop on rural broadband use, and other ERS-commissioned studies.
Economic Stimulus Analyses and Related Matters
Federal Developments 2009-2010
- The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (text and legislative history)
- Conference Committee Summary of the ARRA
- NTIA’s Partial Waiver of Buy American Act for BTOP
- RUS’s Limited Waiver of Buy American Act for BIP
- IRS Letter Regarding Federal Income Taxation of BTOP Grants (March 4, 2010)
- Revenue Procedure 2010-20 on Taxation of Smart Grid Investment Grants
Round Two
- Baller Herbst Analysis of Key Changes for Round Two (January 18, 2010)
- RUS and NTIA Announce Round Two Funds Availability (January 15, 2010)
- NTIA Round Two Notice of Funds Availability (Fed. Reg.) (January 22, 2010)
- NTIA Round Two BTOP Fact Sheet (January 15, 2010)
- NTIA Video: BTOP Policies and Highlights – Round Two
- BTOP Comprehensive Community Infrastructure Grant Guidance (February 11, 2010)
- BTOP Public Computer Centers Grant Guidance (February 11, 2010)
- BTOP Sustainable Broadband Adoption Grant Guidance (February 11, 2010)
- RUS Round Two Notice of Funds Availability (Fed. Reg.) (January 22, 2010)
- Updated BIP Frequently Asked Questions (January 19, 2010)
- BIP Round Two Application Guide (updated March 10, 2010)
Round One
- NTIA-RUS’s Notice of Funds Availability for BTOP and BIP (July 1, 2009)
- NTIA-RUS’s Notice of Funds Availability for State Broadband Data and
Development Grant Program (July 1, 2009) - Final BIP Guidelines (7-10-09)
- Final BTOP Guidelines (7-10-09)
- Frequently Asked Questions – BIP-BTOP (updated)
- Download Applications
- Sign up for NTIA-RUS Workshops
- NTIA Announces First Four State Mapping Grants
Key Stimulus Websites
- Obama Administration’s Central Recovery Website
- NTIA-RUS’s “BroadbandUSA” BTOP-BIP Portal
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration Website
- Rural Utilities Service Website
- Federal Communications Commission Website
- Department of Education Website
- Department of Energy Website
- Department of Homeland Security Website
- Department of Transportation Website
- Department of Health and Human Services Website
- Gateway to State Recovery Sites
Original Sources
- Audits Overview
- Buy American Requirement
- Davis-Bacon Act Requirements
- E-Rate Funding
- Federal Interest Documentation
- Indirect Costs
- Matching Contributions
- Nondiscrimination and Interconnection Requirements
- Program Income
- Subrecipients and Contractors
- Useful Life Schedule
- NTIA-RUS Federal Register Notice Requesting Comments on 20 Key Issues
- Schedule and Topics of NTIA and RUS Meetings
- NTIA BTOP Meeting Agendas, Transcripts, and Archived Videos
- Link to Submit Comments to NTIA/RUS
- Public Comments Filed With NTIA/RUS
- NTIA Ex Parte Contacts
- State Comments on BTOP Applications
Samples of Baller Herbst Analyses
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Section 6001(k)
Section of Reinvestment Act wherein “) Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, a report containing a national broadband plan.”
Free Press: “Dismantling Digital Regulation
On a cold February morning 13 years ago, President Bill Clinton made history by signing the Telecommunications Act of 1996 into law. It was the first signing at the Library of Congress and the first to be streamed live over the Internet. This symbolism was intended to capture the legislation’s promise of bringing the information revolution to the doorstep of every American. As President Clinton signed a bill he described as “truly revolutionary” and that would “protect consumers against monopolies,” he spoke of the future the law would bring. “Soon, working parents will be able to check up on their children in class via computer,” he said. “On a rainy Saturday night, you’ll be able to order up every movie ever produced or every symphony ever
created in a minute’s time.”
Americans are still waiting on the promise of this digital revolution.
Broadband Access is Vital for Economic Growth and Social Coherence
Uffe Toudal Pedersen, permanent secretary of the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, opened the FTTH Council Europe’s annual conference in Copenhagen with these remarks.
Fiber Broadband Networks: The 21st Century Crossroads
By Graham Richard, Broadband Properties Magazine
A collaborative fiber backbone in Indiana helps independent telcos bring FTTH to smaller cities, benefiting both the telcos and the cities.
Fiber Connections Boost Business Productivity
By Masha Zager, Broadband Properties magazine
Will we US taxpayers get our money’s worth by investing in high-speed broadband? There’s good reason to expect we will – especially if the money goes to FTTH networks. They’re stimulating.
ITIF: The Importance of Next-Generation Broadband Networks
Congressional Research Service: The Evolving Broadband Infrastructure
Over the past decade, the telecommunications sector has undergone a vast transformation fueled by rapid technological growth and subsequent evolution of the marketplace. Much of the U.S. policy debate over the evolving telecommunications infrastructure is framed within the context of a “national broadband policy.”
The Digital Road to Recovery
By Robert D. Atkinson, Daniel Castro and Stephen J. Ezell
Spurring investments in IT infrastructure not only can provide an important short-term boost to the U.S. economy; it also can lay the groundwork for long-term economic growth, international competitiveness, and significant improvement in Americans’ quality of life.
Congressional Research Service: What’s Different About Broadband?
Broadband network deployment projects represent large scale, long term investments that affect the overall productivity of economic activity in the geographic areas in which they are built, and thus fit the conventional definition of infrastructure. But they also have several characteristics that distinguish them from traditional infrastructure projects. These unique characteristics may dictate that government programs in support of broadband deployment be structured differently than conventional infrastructure programs.
State Developments 2007-08
- Connecticut HB 6780 (positive)
- Illinois Act 95-0684, Section 35 (positive)(enacted)
- Missouri HB 801 (positive)(enacted)(No ban on “Internet type services”)
- New Jersey P.L. 2007, c.191 (mixed)(passed)
- North Carolina HB 1587 (2007)(negative) (not passed)
Examples of opposition to North Carolina HB 1587:
- AARP
- Alcatel-Lucent
- City of Chapel Hill
- Town of Davidson
- EDUCAUSE
- City of Fayetteville
- City of Greensboro
- Hitachi
- City of Raleigh
- City of Wilson
- FTTH Council
- Intel
- Mainstream Fiber Networks
- NC Counties Association
- NC Justice Center
- NC League of Municipalities
- NC PIRG
- SEATOA
- Telecommunications Industry Association
- Tropos
- Pennsylvania HB 327 (positive)(not enacted)
- Rhode Island H5839 (positive)(not enacted)
- Vermont HB 248 (positive)(enacted)
- Washington SB 6102 (positive)(not enacted in 2007, reintroduced in 2008)
- West Virginia (positive) (vetoed)
- Wyoming (restrictions limited to exclusive contracts)
Barack Obama on Technology
Barack Obama’s current platform on technology including his perspective on broadband.
Peregrine an economic windfall for the Cedar Valley
Peregrine Financial announced its intention to move the company headquarters from downtown Chicago to the Beaver Hills area of Cedar Falls. The project is expected to have a total economic impact of $124 million per year, thanks in large part to the Peregrine executives who are expected to move with the headquarters and their average yearly compensation of approximately $200,000 each.